Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    TRENDING :
    • Controversial changes to the definition of a ‘professional’ degree were just blocked. What does it mean for student borrowing caps?
    • ‘Careless People’ author, in explosive new lawsuit, accuses Meta of trying to silence her
    • Winning in the era of taste and talent
    • People have stopped trusting news but not newsrooms
    • Venezuela earthquakes: Thousands injured, missing, without food or water. Here are 4 ways you can help right now
    • AI doesn’t scale by removing people
    • Streaming live World Cup soccer games on airplanes is becoming a reality
    • A new court ruling could shape how Americans vote in the next election
    Populist Bulletin
    • Home
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    • Economy
    • Business
    • Headline News
    Populist Bulletin
    Home»Business»A rejected candidate keeps demanding to know why I didn’t hire him
    Business 5 Mins Read

    A rejected candidate keeps demanding to know why I didn’t hire him

    Business 5 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Inc.com columnist Alison Green answers questions about workplace and management issues—everything from how to deal with a micromanaging boss to how to talk to someone on your team about body odor.

    A reader asks:

    Last fall, I left a beloved job and assisted them in hiring two people to replace me. One was an internal hire, the other required an outside interview process. We received over 50 applications, narrowed it down to 13 phone interviews, then seven in-person interviews, and finally made a very satisfying hiring decision.

    At each step along the way, I sent out polite rejection emails to those who didn’t make the next level. It was very professional, and all candidates but one reacted very well. However, one gentleman who was not granted an interview wrote back saying that since he was “clearly overqualified for such a position,” he “would have at least appreciated an interview.” In fact, he had no qualifications for the position: he’d never done the work of the role, worked in our industry, nor had any background in our field.

    I never responded, but he tracked me down and has asked me several times why he wasn’t interviewed. He is clearly well-educated and has an interesting work history, but nothing on his résumé was even remotely connected to our field, and frankly, he came across as condescending. That said, we are community-based and try to be friendly, kind, and helpful to all.

    I’m still peripherally involved in the organization, but no longer an employee. In fact, I moved across the country and took another job. Do I have any obligation to write him back? And, if so, how honest should I be? Apparently, he’s written to the organization, too, and they refuse to deal with him. If I write him back, might he leave them alone? A small part of me feels as if he’d benefit from knowing the truth, but I also feel like maybe it’s none of my business. I recognize that if I respond to him, it would not be in any way official. What should I do?

    Green responds:

    Block and ignore.

    You don’t work there anymore; there’s absolutely no reason you should have to engage with this guy and risk him getting more aggressive or angry.

    You didn’t do anything wrong in this hiring process. In fact, you did everything right! You sent out polite, timely rejection emails. You made hiring decisions that you feel good about. You don’t have anything to explain or defend or justify. You don’t even have to explain (here or to this candidate) why he wasn’t invited to interview. Employers regularly have more qualified candidates than they can interview, and there doesn’t need to be anything wrong with someone for them to be rejected; it can just be that others were stronger.

    While most candidates are professional and understand the nature of the hiring process, there are always a few who can’t believe they didn’t get an interview and think employers should have to justify that to them. You aren’t obligated to respond to them at all, but especially after they become rude or pushy.

    If you still worked there, I’d tell you to respond to him one time and say something like, “We received a tremendous amount of interest in the position, and the hiring process was very competitive. We weren’t able to offer interviews to many people with strong qualifications for the role.” Or, if you prefer, “We received a tremendous amount of interest in the position and we focused on candidates with experience in Skill X and Industry Y.”

    But you don’t even work there anymore! Not only do you not need to respond to this person, but you probably shouldn’t—the organization needs to be in charge of its communications with candidates (particularly since there can be legal ramifications if you word something badly). If they’re not responding, that’s their call.

    I’m not clear on whether the candidate somehow tracked down your personal email account and is messaging you there. If he’s emailing you at your personal account, that’s a real overstep (and a sign of some seriously inappropriate investment) and you absolutely should block him. If you want, you can email back once to say, “I no longer work for [organization’s name] and cannot answer any questions about their hiring processes. Please do not contact me at my personal account again” and then block him—but feel free to skip that and just block him.

    I do get that the organization is community-based and wants people to have warm feelings toward it. That’s an argument for them (not you) responding—once, and with the kind of language above. But after that, candidates who are rude or hostile don’t need to be indulged. It’s OK to decline to engage.

    —Alison Green

    This article originally appeared on Fast Company’s sister website, Inc.com. 

    Inc. is the voice of the American entrepreneur. We inspire, inform, and document the most fascinating people in business: the risk-takers, the innovators, and the ultra-driven go-getters that represent the most dynamic force in the American economy.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Controversial changes to the definition of a ‘professional’ degree were just blocked. What does it mean for student borrowing caps?

    June 27, 2026

    ‘Careless People’ author, in explosive new lawsuit, accuses Meta of trying to silence her

    June 27, 2026

    Winning in the era of taste and talent

    June 27, 2026
    Top News
    Economy 5 Mins Read

    Digital Currency And The End Of Financial Privacy

    Economy 5 Mins Read

    The push toward digital currency is being framed as innovation and efficiency, but when you…

    Layoffs don’t have to feel inhumane

    June 7, 2026

    Minnesota is holding an economic blackout on January 23 to protest ICE: What to know about the ‘Day of Truth and Freedom’

    January 22, 2026

    Iftar With the Knick and the Mayor

    March 16, 2026
    Top Trending
    Business 3 Mins Read

    Controversial changes to the definition of a ‘professional’ degree were just blocked. What does it mean for student borrowing caps?

    Business 3 Mins Read

    A federal judge has temporarily blocked a Trump administration rule that would…

    Business 3 Mins Read

    ‘Careless People’ author, in explosive new lawsuit, accuses Meta of trying to silence her

    Business 3 Mins Read

    A former Meta executive whose memoir, Careless People, provides an explosive insider…

    Business 6 Mins Read

    Winning in the era of taste and talent

    Business 6 Mins Read

    Perhaps the marketing word of 2026 is “taste.” Creators debate it on…

    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    About us

    The Populist Bulletin was founded with a fervent commitment to inform, inspire, empower and spark meaningful conversations about the economy, business, politics, government accountability, globalization, and the preservation of American cultural heritage.

    We are devoted to delivering straightforward, unfiltered, compelling, relatable stories that resonate with the majority of the American public, while boldly challenging false mainstream narratives that seem to only serve entrenched elitists, and foreign interests.

    Top Picks

    Controversial changes to the definition of a ‘professional’ degree were just blocked. What does it mean for student borrowing caps?

    June 27, 2026

    ‘Careless People’ author, in explosive new lawsuit, accuses Meta of trying to silence her

    June 27, 2026

    Winning in the era of taste and talent

    June 27, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    Copyright © 2025 Populist Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.