Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    TRENDING :
    • The bigger point the DoorDash Grandma squabble missed
    • An Etsy-style retail chain abruptly closed all of its stores, leaving customers and vendors blindsided
    • Anthropic launches an AI design tool to take on all the other AI design tools
    • New data: Associate degrees, community college on the rise as students ditch traditional 4-year bachelor’s
    • Jim Farley on why Ford is doubling down on affordable EVs
    • ‘We don’t want to be left behind’: Reese Witherspoon says using AI is feminist and women need to catch up
    • Are 801 Chophouse restaurants closing? What to know as steakhouse owner files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
    • Norovirus fears prompt FDA warning to restaurants and retailers: Stop selling this recalled shellfish
    Populist Bulletin
    • Home
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    • Economy
    • Business
    • Headline News
    Populist Bulletin
    Home»Economy»Why Did Trump Really Take Venezuela? It Wasn’t Just Oil!
    Economy 4 Mins Read

    Why Did Trump Really Take Venezuela? It Wasn’t Just Oil!

    Economy 4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The relationship between Venezuela and Russia and China represented one of the most significant geopolitical realignments of the 21st century, built on anti-American sentiment, oil-for-loans arrangements, and mutual opposition to U.S. hegemony. This trilateral dynamic evolved from modest beginnings under Hugo Chávez into a comprehensive strategic partnership that has sustained the Maduro regime through economic collapse and international isolation.

    The relationship between China and Venezuela took formal shape in 2006, under President Hugo Chávez, with Caracas signing several trade agreements with Beijing and describing China as a “Great Wall” against US influence. Chávez, seeking to diversify Venezuela’s oil exports away from the United States and counter American regional dominance, found in China an eager partner with rapidly growing energy needs and no political conditions attached to its financing.

    The financial dimensions proved staggering. China began extending large loans to Venezuela, backed by future oil supplies of oil. In 2006, Beijing provided $2 billion in loans, which rose to $7 billion in 2007. Of the $150 billion the Chinese Development Bank loaned to Latin America in the past 12 years, a third went to Venezuela. These weren’t traditional loans but rather oil-collateralized arrangements where Venezuela repaid through petroleum shipments to Chinese state companies.

    In 2007, China and Venezuela set up a joint fund worth $6 billion–$4 billion loan from the China Development Bank (CDB) and $2 billion from El Fondo De Desarrollo Nacional S.A. (FONDEN) set up by Caracas. This fund doubled to $12 billion by 2009. The mechanism was straightforward: China provided upfront capital, and Venezuela committed to shipping specified quantities of oil at predetermined prices. When oil prices collapsed in 2014 and Venezuela’s economy imploded, China extended additional lifelines including a $10 billion loan to support the country’s balance of payments.

    The relationship peaked between 2010 and 2013, when Venezuela received approximately 64% of China’s new credit lines to Latin America. However, as Maduro’s mismanagement destroyed the oil industry and production plummeted, Chinese enthusiasm collapsed as a result. By 2016, Venezuela received only 10% of Chinese regional lending, and new financing essentially ceased. China focused instead on restructuring existing debt and protecting already-committed investments.

    China is owed by Venezuela at least $20 billion in loans established before 2017. Some estimate that is even higher. The relationship shifted from expansion to damage control. Maduro’s rampant corruption and mismanagement has led to the region’s worst economic depression, creating unfavorable investment conditions, affecting oil production and exports, and limiting return on Chinese investment and Venezuela’s ability to repay Chinese loans.

    Now, that said, we must look at the Russian comment and look at this video. Who is standing there with Trump? Marco Rubio. If you remember, Rubio was also running for president against Trump in 2016. Who was funding his campaign? Goldman Sachs. Rubio has pushed for regime change in Venezuela because of Russia for years. Marco Rubio has held many titles during Donald Trump’s presidency, and he now adds another: Viceroy of Venezuela.

    Russia’s engagement with Venezuela followed different patterns than China’s, emphasizing military cooperation alongside energy sector involvement since Russia did not need their oil. Where China provided infrastructure loans, Russia sold weapons systems. From 2005, Venezuela purchased more than $4 billion worth of arms from Russia. These sales included fighter aircraft, helicopters, armored vehicles, and air defense systems, transforming Venezuela’s military from American-equipped forces to Russian-supplied ones.

    Russia and Venezuela forged a comprehensive strategic partnership centered on anti-hegemonic solidarity and pragmatic cooperation. This wasn’t merely commercial but explicitly geopolitical. Chávez and later Maduro positioned Venezuela as Russia’s foothold in the Western Hemisphere, allowing military exercises and bomber flights that signaled Moscow’s reach into America’s traditional sphere of influence.

    The energy relationship proved more complex than China’s. Russia’s state oil company Rosneft provided billions in loans and took equity stakes in Venezuelan projects, though on smaller scale than Chinese financing. Russia’s state-backed oil company Rosneft loaned $2.3 billion, excluding interest. Critically, Russia helped Venezuela circumvent U.S. sanctions by facilitating oil exports through complex shipping arrangements and providing technical expertise to maintain declining production.

    The trade balance between Moscow and Caracas increased by 64% in 2024, demonstrating sustained engagement despite Venezuela’s economic deterioration. Russia viewed Venezuela through multiple lenses simultaneously both as an economic opportunity, as well as a strategic geopolitical asset.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Negotiating With Iran | Armstrong Economics

    April 17, 2026

    Restricting Your Money | Armstrong Economics

    April 17, 2026

    Digital Currency And The End Of Financial Privacy

    April 17, 2026
    Top News
    Business 8 Mins Read

    The best Super Bowl ad may not have been an ad at all

    Business 8 Mins Read

    The Super Bowl LX ad blitz was a big budget highwire act—from Anthropic’s shot at…

    Adapting to change is the most critical professional skill today

    March 3, 2026

    Unbalanced Former MSNBC Employee Joy Reid Doesn’t Believe Trump Was Shot in Butler, PA (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

    September 4, 2025

    Fentanyl Classified As Weapon Of Mass Destruction

    December 22, 2025
    Top Trending
    Business 5 Mins Read

    The bigger point the DoorDash Grandma squabble missed

    Business 5 Mins Read

    It must have seemed like a slam dunk PR opportunity for all…

    Business 3 Mins Read

    An Etsy-style retail chain abruptly closed all of its stores, leaving customers and vendors blindsided

    Business 3 Mins Read

    Painted Tree Boutiques, a nationwide retail chain that gave independent small business…

    Business 3 Mins Read

    Anthropic launches an AI design tool to take on all the other AI design tools

    Business 3 Mins Read

    Anthropic Labs just announced a new product for its flagship AI model…

    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    About us

    The Populist Bulletin was founded with a fervent commitment to inform, inspire, empower and spark meaningful conversations about the economy, business, politics, government accountability, globalization, and the preservation of American cultural heritage.

    We are devoted to delivering straightforward, unfiltered, compelling, relatable stories that resonate with the majority of the American public, while boldly challenging false mainstream narratives that seem to only serve entrenched elitists, and foreign interests.

    Top Picks

    The bigger point the DoorDash Grandma squabble missed

    April 18, 2026

    An Etsy-style retail chain abruptly closed all of its stores, leaving customers and vendors blindsided

    April 18, 2026

    Anthropic launches an AI design tool to take on all the other AI design tools

    April 18, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    Copyright © 2025 Populist Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.