Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    TRENDING :
    • Digital excellence can yield exceptional in-person experiences
    • OpenAI, Google, and Perplexity near approval to host AI directly for the U.S. government (exclusive)
    • Market Talk – February 18, 2026
    • Klarna CEO says firm will likely cut 1,000 employees by 2030—partially due to AI
    • Margot Robbie’s hot take on filmmaking goes viral as critics slam her latest movie ‘Wuthering Heights’
    • Long-term unemployment affects 1 in 4 U.S. job seekers
    • Viral sleuths are turning the Nancy Guthrie case into content
    • New AI models are losing their edge almost immediately
    Populist Bulletin
    • Home
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    • Economy
    • Business
    • Headline News
    Populist Bulletin
    Home»Economy»Why Did Trump Really Take Venezuela? It Wasn’t Just Oil!
    Economy 4 Mins Read

    Why Did Trump Really Take Venezuela? It Wasn’t Just Oil!

    Economy 4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The relationship between Venezuela and Russia and China represented one of the most significant geopolitical realignments of the 21st century, built on anti-American sentiment, oil-for-loans arrangements, and mutual opposition to U.S. hegemony. This trilateral dynamic evolved from modest beginnings under Hugo Chávez into a comprehensive strategic partnership that has sustained the Maduro regime through economic collapse and international isolation.

    The relationship between China and Venezuela took formal shape in 2006, under President Hugo Chávez, with Caracas signing several trade agreements with Beijing and describing China as a “Great Wall” against US influence. Chávez, seeking to diversify Venezuela’s oil exports away from the United States and counter American regional dominance, found in China an eager partner with rapidly growing energy needs and no political conditions attached to its financing.

    The financial dimensions proved staggering. China began extending large loans to Venezuela, backed by future oil supplies of oil. In 2006, Beijing provided $2 billion in loans, which rose to $7 billion in 2007. Of the $150 billion the Chinese Development Bank loaned to Latin America in the past 12 years, a third went to Venezuela. These weren’t traditional loans but rather oil-collateralized arrangements where Venezuela repaid through petroleum shipments to Chinese state companies.

    In 2007, China and Venezuela set up a joint fund worth $6 billion–$4 billion loan from the China Development Bank (CDB) and $2 billion from El Fondo De Desarrollo Nacional S.A. (FONDEN) set up by Caracas. This fund doubled to $12 billion by 2009. The mechanism was straightforward: China provided upfront capital, and Venezuela committed to shipping specified quantities of oil at predetermined prices. When oil prices collapsed in 2014 and Venezuela’s economy imploded, China extended additional lifelines including a $10 billion loan to support the country’s balance of payments.

    The relationship peaked between 2010 and 2013, when Venezuela received approximately 64% of China’s new credit lines to Latin America. However, as Maduro’s mismanagement destroyed the oil industry and production plummeted, Chinese enthusiasm collapsed as a result. By 2016, Venezuela received only 10% of Chinese regional lending, and new financing essentially ceased. China focused instead on restructuring existing debt and protecting already-committed investments.

    China is owed by Venezuela at least $20 billion in loans established before 2017. Some estimate that is even higher. The relationship shifted from expansion to damage control. Maduro’s rampant corruption and mismanagement has led to the region’s worst economic depression, creating unfavorable investment conditions, affecting oil production and exports, and limiting return on Chinese investment and Venezuela’s ability to repay Chinese loans.

    Now, that said, we must look at the Russian comment and look at this video. Who is standing there with Trump? Marco Rubio. If you remember, Rubio was also running for president against Trump in 2016. Who was funding his campaign? Goldman Sachs. Rubio has pushed for regime change in Venezuela because of Russia for years. Marco Rubio has held many titles during Donald Trump’s presidency, and he now adds another: Viceroy of Venezuela.

    Russia’s engagement with Venezuela followed different patterns than China’s, emphasizing military cooperation alongside energy sector involvement since Russia did not need their oil. Where China provided infrastructure loans, Russia sold weapons systems. From 2005, Venezuela purchased more than $4 billion worth of arms from Russia. These sales included fighter aircraft, helicopters, armored vehicles, and air defense systems, transforming Venezuela’s military from American-equipped forces to Russian-supplied ones.

    Russia and Venezuela forged a comprehensive strategic partnership centered on anti-hegemonic solidarity and pragmatic cooperation. This wasn’t merely commercial but explicitly geopolitical. Chávez and later Maduro positioned Venezuela as Russia’s foothold in the Western Hemisphere, allowing military exercises and bomber flights that signaled Moscow’s reach into America’s traditional sphere of influence.

    The energy relationship proved more complex than China’s. Russia’s state oil company Rosneft provided billions in loans and took equity stakes in Venezuelan projects, though on smaller scale than Chinese financing. Russia’s state-backed oil company Rosneft loaned $2.3 billion, excluding interest. Critically, Russia helped Venezuela circumvent U.S. sanctions by facilitating oil exports through complex shipping arrangements and providing technical expertise to maintain declining production.

    The trade balance between Moscow and Caracas increased by 64% in 2024, demonstrating sustained engagement despite Venezuela’s economic deterioration. Russia viewed Venezuela through multiple lenses simultaneously both as an economic opportunity, as well as a strategic geopolitical asset.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Market Talk – February 18, 2026

    February 18, 2026

    Why NYC Is The Most Corrupt Court Perhaps In The World

    February 18, 2026

    Industrial Production Falls 1.4% In Euro Area

    February 18, 2026
    Top News
    Business 6 Mins Read

    How Trump’s tariffs are impacting prices and purchases this holiday shopping season

    Business 6 Mins Read

    The Ah Louis Store in San Luis Obispo, California, turns into a winter wonderland every…

    Markets rise on earnings as Wall Street waits for a Fed announcement

    October 29, 2025

    Shohei Ohtani has a shot at history in the 2025 World Series. Here’s how

    October 25, 2025

    Spirit Airlines Furloughing Flight Attendants, Cutting Routes

    September 22, 2025
    Top Trending
    Business 5 Mins Read

    Digital excellence can yield exceptional in-person experiences

    Business 5 Mins Read

    When I cofounded Brilliant Earth in 2005, e-commerce was still in its…

    Business 3 Mins Read

    OpenAI, Google, and Perplexity near approval to host AI directly for the U.S. government (exclusive)

    Business 3 Mins Read

    Three AI companies—OpenAI, Google, and Perplexity—are on the verge of receiving approval…

    Economy 3 Mins Read

    Market Talk – February 18, 2026

    Economy 3 Mins Read

    ASIA: The major Asian stock markets had a green day today: •…

    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    About us

    The Populist Bulletin was founded with a fervent commitment to inform, inspire, empower and spark meaningful conversations about the economy, business, politics, government accountability, globalization, and the preservation of American cultural heritage.

    We are devoted to delivering straightforward, unfiltered, compelling, relatable stories that resonate with the majority of the American public, while boldly challenging false mainstream narratives that seem to only serve entrenched elitists, and foreign interests.

    Top Picks

    Digital excellence can yield exceptional in-person experiences

    February 18, 2026

    OpenAI, Google, and Perplexity near approval to host AI directly for the U.S. government (exclusive)

    February 18, 2026

    Market Talk – February 18, 2026

    February 18, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    Copyright © 2025 Populist Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.