New York’s attempt to dictate how federal immigration agents dress and identify themselves just ran headfirst into the Constitution.
A federal judge handed the Trump administration a major, though incomplete, victory Monday, temporarily blocking New York from enforcing laws that required ICE agents and other federal law-enforcement officers to uncover their faces and display visible identification while performing their duties.
U.S. District Judge Mae A. D’Agostino, a Barack Obama appointee, ruled that the Justice Department was likely to prevail on its argument that New York had directly regulated the federal government in violation of the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.
“New York cannot impose its own uniform requirements on federal agents simply because it disagrees with how the Federal Government is exercising its authority,” D’Agostino wrote in the 51-page court order.
D’Agostino added, “Defendants may be correct that federal immigration officers wearing masks and not displaying viable identification creates certain dangerous situations that the Face Covering and Identification Acts remedy. ‘But that argument is addressed to the wisdom of the federal policy. And settled law establishes that federal, not state, authorities make the policies that animate the enforcement of federal immigration laws.’”
Gov. Kathy Hochul and Attorney General Letitia James tried to impose Albany’s political agenda directly on federal officers carrying out federal law, and even an Obama-appointed judge concluded that they likely crossed a constitutional line.
The laws, signed by Hochul in May, prohibited officers from wearing masks that concealed their faces while interacting with the public and required uniformed officers to display their agency and at least one individual identifier, such as a name or badge number.
The requirements expressly covered federal agencies including ICE, Customs and Border Protection, the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Administration. Willful violations could bring criminal penalties, including a misdemeanor for repeat offenses.
The court concluded that these were not ordinary, generally applicable public-safety rules. They specifically attempted to control federal officers while those officers were performing official federal duties.
That is something New York cannot do.
The Gateway Pundit previously reported that Hochul urged New Yorkers to report masked ICE agents through a form operated by James’ office after the mask law took effect.
Federal officials argued that agents use face coverings to reduce the danger of doxxing, stalking and threats against themselves and their families. Hochul’s administration countered that masked enforcement undermined transparency and frightened immigrant communities.
But D’Agostino emphasized that the immediate legal question was not whether masking was good policy. It was whether a state could directly regulate federal operations.
The answer, at least at this preliminary stage, was no.
BUT THE COURT LEFT NEW YORK’S 287(g) BAN STANDING
The ruling was not a complete victory for the Justice Department.
D’Agostino refused to block New York’s separate “Termination Act,” which prohibits state and local agencies from entering or remaining in Section 287(g) agreements with the federal government.
Those agreements allow specially trained local officers to perform certain immigration-enforcement functions under federal supervision.
The Justice Department argued that New York’s law interfered with federal immigration authority, discriminated against the federal government and unlawfully destroyed existing agreements.
The judge rejected those arguments at the preliminary-injunction stage.
Unlike the mask and identification laws, D’Agostino concluded, the 287(g) ban regulates New York’s own local governments and law-enforcement agencies. Federal law makes participation in the program voluntary and does not require states or municipalities to enter such agreements.
In other words, New York cannot dictate how ICE agents dress, but it can order its own local agencies not to help them.
The provision is scheduled to make existing covered agreements void and unenforceable on August 25.
Hochul and James quickly celebrated that portion of the decision, claiming the ban would keep local officers focused on local policing. They also acknowledged that the mask law had been enjoined and said they were “reviewing all legal options.”
The result is a split decision with enormous consequences.
Federal agents will not be forced by Albany to expose their faces or display the precise identification demanded by state lawmakers while the case proceeds. But Hochul’s administration can continue dismantling formal cooperation between ICE and local New York law enforcement.
This is only a preliminary injunction, not a final judgment striking the laws permanently. The injunction will remain in effect until final judgment or another court order.
For now, Hochul’s attempt to control federal agents has been stopped, but New York’s broader campaign to isolate ICE from local law enforcement remains very much alive.
The post Obama-Appointed Judge Blocks New York’s Attempt to Force ICE Agents to Unmask — But Leaves Anti-ICE Cooperation Ban in Place appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.