America, we have a problem. This is one judge who went out of her was to rule against Trump desperate to find not law, but an opinion that is a disgrace to the nation and she should be removed from office as a national security threat. In an order issued Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Denise L. Casper wrote that federal law and the Constitution give power to a president to manage elections.
“Our Constitution vests control over federal elections in the States, subject to some oversight by Congress.” She added: “While the Constitution vests the President with ‘executive power’ and commands him to ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,’ it does not grant the President any specific powers over elections.”
The ruling by Casper effectively converts a preliminary injunction that she had issued a year ago, in which she temporarily blocked many of Trump’s efforts to overhaul elections, into a permanent ban. She is not ruling that illegal aliens can vote, she is claiming Trump has no power to prevent non-Americans from voting. It figures, she is from Massachusetts and just because Trump is a republican he has to rule against him. She obviously has no problem allowing the entire world to now vote in US elections since the present has no authority to enforce the Constitution. Since the President has the duty to “faithfully” execute the law, then she is explicitly stating that there is no law to prevent the rest of the world from voting in US elections. Everyone is welcome.
I hope the Federal Court of Massachusetts get inundated with complaints. She should be disbarred for she is incapable of being not just impartial, but competent in comprehending the Constitution. Claiming there is no explicit clause to say only an American can vote, then what the hell, there is also noting to say someone cannot vote in every state simultaneously with mail-in ballots. When the Founding Father wrote the Constitution, they did not assume it applied worldwide.
This phrase, “We the People,” is of paramount importance. We must look at the entire objective of creating the Constitution to fully comprehend its true meaning. If you were English and committed a crime in France, the French king could not punish you, for you were the property or “subject” of the English king. France would send you back in chains to England, explaining what you did, for only your sovereign had the jurisdiction to punish you – not where the crime occurred. This is incredibly important to understand.
Since the American Revolution was against the monarchy, why would they comply with international law at that time and send someone back to England for a crime committed in America to be punished by a king they did not recognize? The American Constitution established territorial jurisdiction for the first time. So, someone convicted of a crime would be punished in America for his crime in America. Now, the problem has become a question of rights under the Constitution. Did a foreign citizen have a right to a fair trial? The definition of “We the People” had to extend to anyone tried in America, regardless of their citizenship. There is nothing to indicate that this extended to a right for non-Americans to vote.
She has fulfilled our model. People will not longer trust any election because of people like her determined to impose their Marxist Agenda to destroy the American economy like Europe. Without CONFIDENCE in government, people will not buy the debt, sovereign defaults then follow, and pension funds are wiped out. Just like Marx and Lenin, everything has to be their way or no way. So, the world can now vote in America no problem.