Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    TRENDING :
    • What Is a Bookkeeping Guide and Why Do You Need It?
    • Top 5 Clip Creator Tools for Effortless Video Editing
    • Key Differences Between AP and AR
    • What Is the Longest Duration You Can Get for a Business Loan?
    • What Are Loyalty Points and How Do They Work?
    • 5 Programs Like QuickBooks for Seamless Accounting
    • Private student loans: A cautionary guide to your options
    • How to navigate uncertainty in an increasingly uncertain world
    Populist Bulletin
    • Home
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    • Economy
    • Business
    • Headline News
    Populist Bulletin
    Home»World Politics»California Legislature Passes Bill Banning ICE Officers From Wearing Masks
    World Politics 4 Mins Read

    California Legislature Passes Bill Banning ICE Officers From Wearing Masks

    World Politics 4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    This article was originally published  by The Epoch Times: California Legislature Passes Bill Banning ICE Officers From Wearing Masks

    The bill makes the wearing of a mask while performing official duties a criminal misdemeanor, and imposes a minimum liability of $10,000 for certain acts.

    WASHINGTON—Both houses of the California Legislature have passed a bill that bans federal law enforcement officers from wearing masks while performing their duties, with criminal penalties for noncompliance.

    The bill, SB-627, bans any law enforcement officer or agent from wearing a “facial covering that conceals or obscures their facial identity in the performance of their duties,” with a few exceptions—such as motorcycle helmets, facial coverings for “SWAT” officers, and N-95 medical masks to protect against COVID-19.

    Violations of the bill would be punishable by either a fine or the charge of a criminal misdemeanor.

    In addition, the bill strips qualified immunity from law enforcement officers and agents who, while wearing a mask, commit “assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, abuse of process, or malicious prosecution,” with a minimum penalty of $10,000 if they are found liable.

    The bill’s provisions apply to federal, state, and local law enforcement personnel operating throughout California.

    “The ICE masked secret police are raining terror on communities across California, and it has to stop. Law enforcement should never be easily confused with the guy in the ski mask robbing a liquor store, yet that’s what’s happening with ICE’s extreme masking behavior,” wrote state Sen. Scott Wiener, a Democrat and the bill’s leading sponsor.

    “They should be proud to show their faces and provide identifying information in the course of duty.”

    Democratic Party officials, who largely oppose the Trump administration’s efforts to remove all illegal immigrants, have frequently criticized federal law enforcement officers’ covering of their faces with masks, arguing that their actions prevent accountability and resemble the gangs they seek to apprehend.

    The agencies have defended personnel masking, stating that it prevents personal harassment of themselves and their families by activists who disagree with the government’s policies.

    “ICE law enforcement officers wear masks to prevent doxing, which can (and has) placed them and their families at risk. All ICE law enforcement officers carry badges and credentials and will identify themselves when required for public safety or legal necessity,” Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) wrote on its website’s frequently asked questions webpage.

    ICE is the principal agency responsible for apprehending, prosecuting, and removing illegal immigrants from the United States.

    Other law enforcement agencies have also worn masks while assisting ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations officers in detaining suspected illegal immigrants.

    It is unclear whether the bill is constitutional or not. The Supreme Court of the United States, in Arizona v. United States (2012), held that states cannot regulate federal immigration law enforcement.

    However, the word “immigration” is not mentioned in the engrossed text of the bill and presumably applies to all law enforcement activity.

    The bill was approved by a two-thirds majority in the California Senate and a simple majority in the lower house, the Assembly.

    The bill now heads to Gov. Gavin Newsom. His office declined to comment on whether he would sign it, referring to the bill as “pending legislation.”

    If you found this article interesting, please consider supporting traditional journalism

    Our first edition was published 25 years ago from a basement in Atlanta. Today, The Epoch Times brings fact-based, award-winning journalism to millions of Americans.

    Our journalists have been threatened, arrested, and assaulted, but our commitment to independent journalism has never wavered. This year marks our 25th year of independent reporting, free from corporate and political influence.

    That’s why you’re invited to a limited-time introductory offer — just $1 per week — so you can join millions already celebrating independent news.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Breaking: FBI Arrests Suspect in DC Pipe Bomber Investigation | The Gateway Pundit

    December 4, 2025

    Ukrainians Attack Druzhba Oil Pipeline Again, Threatening Energy Supplies to Hungary and Slovakia (VIDEOS) | The Gateway Pundit

    December 4, 2025

    Victor Reacts: Is the Minneapolis Police Chief Trying to Have a Stand-off with ICE? (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

    December 4, 2025
    Top News
    Business 7 Mins Read

    Why America losing the global EV race hurts its own auto industry

    Business 7 Mins Read

    At the 2026 Detroit Auto Show, the spotlight quietly shifted. Electric vehicles, once framed as…

    Best Social Media Video Makers

    April 5, 2026

    Trump Announces New Guidance Protecting The Right To Prayer In Schools

    September 13, 2025

    Wealthfront IPO: Stock price closely watched today as financial platform starts trading on the Nasdaq

    December 12, 2025
    Top Trending
    Business 7 Mins Read

    What Is a Bookkeeping Guide and Why Do You Need It?

    Business 7 Mins Read

    A bookkeeping guide is a crucial tool that outlines how to maintain…

    Business 7 Mins Read

    Top 5 Clip Creator Tools for Effortless Video Editing

    Business 7 Mins Read

    If you’re looking to streamline your video editing process, the right clip…

    Business 17 Mins Read

    Key Differences Between AP and AR

    Business 17 Mins Read

    When discussing the key differences between Accounts Payable (AP) and Accounts Receivable…

    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    About us

    The Populist Bulletin was founded with a fervent commitment to inform, inspire, empower and spark meaningful conversations about the economy, business, politics, government accountability, globalization, and the preservation of American cultural heritage.

    We are devoted to delivering straightforward, unfiltered, compelling, relatable stories that resonate with the majority of the American public, while boldly challenging false mainstream narratives that seem to only serve entrenched elitists, and foreign interests.

    Top Picks

    What Is a Bookkeeping Guide and Why Do You Need It?

    April 18, 2026

    Top 5 Clip Creator Tools for Effortless Video Editing

    April 18, 2026

    Key Differences Between AP and AR

    April 18, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    Copyright © 2025 Populist Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.