Much like its peers in the tech industry, Oracle is pouring money into AI infrastructure. The tech giant inked a lucrative $300 billion deal with OpenAI last year to build out AI data centers, in a bid to compete with companies like Amazon and Microsoft. But the deal requires Oracle to spend a significant amount of money upfront—a move that is now pushing the company to cull its workforce.
According to recent reports, Oracle is planning major layoffs that would reportedly affect thousands of jobs. The company had already earmarked about $1.6 billion for restructuring costs this year—largely due to “employee severance costs”—indicating there would be job cuts. As of February, that sum has now increased by $500 million, bringing overall restructuring costs to $2.1 billion. Bloomberg has reported that the layoffs would impact many parts of the business and could take effect this month; some of the job losses will also target roles that AI is rendering less essential.
The forthcoming job cuts were framed as broader than Oracle’s usual rolling approach to layoffs; the company typically avoids large-scale layoffs that merit a public announcement. Oracle would also effectively freeze hiring in its cloud division, according to Bloomberg.
Oracle joins a growing list of companies that are trimming headcount due to AI—but as with many other employers, there’s limited evidence that the company is replacing workers with AI en masse. Instead, these layoffs largely seem to be driven by Oracle’s extensive investments in AI, which could take years to pay off. Oracle is currently raising $50 billion in debt and equity to finance its AI aspirations, and analysts have said the company will likely continue losing money on this venture until 2030.
Last month, Jack Dorsey announced major layoffs at his fintech company Block, which drew widespread consternation. Dorsey framed those job losses, which affected 40% of the company’s workforce, as the direct result of efficiency gains from AI. But many companies have also used AI as a convenient explanation for more pedestrian cost-cutting measures, even as economists have argued that AI is not yet displacing workers on a large scale. Some companies have cited AI rather than blaming issues like immigration policy and tariffs, which might not be as politically expedient or appealing to shareholders.
Others, like Oracle, are slashing jobs over AI—but not necessarily because they’re outright using AI to replace workers. Microsoft, too, has made sweeping investments in AI, spending tens of billions of dollars on data centers while laying off over 15,000 in 2025. The layoffs at companies like Microsoft and Amazon have also targeted middle managers, the sorts of jobs that can’t exactly be replaced by AI at the moment.
The AI boom has also helped cement an era of forever layoffs, in which even big tech jobs no longer hold the promise of stability. Since the pandemic, tech employers have become especially reliant on layoffs—a trend that has been accelerated with the rise of AI. Whether or not workers are getting explicitly displaced or ousted due to automation, few jobs are now safe if companies value AI over human capital.