Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    TRENDING :
    • Did ‘Stop! That! Train!’ use AI? Social media is suspicious—and the director’s comments aren’t helping
    • Still at the cottage? Don’t worry, the ‘Heated Rivalry’ fleece is finally for sale
    • Kalshi reports ex-congressman George Santos to DOJ over suspicious trades
    • Trump’s AI order gives Washington a look at frontier models, but not much leverage
    • The Ghosts of Antonio Gramsci
    • These phones take photos that really don’t look like they came from a phone
    • In the Race to Succeed Nadler, Micah Lasher Says Fighting Trump Is Not Enough
    • Warren Buffett explained that the greatest measure of success at the end of your life comes down to 1 word
    Populist Bulletin
    • Home
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    • Economy
    • Business
    • Headline News
    Populist Bulletin
    Home»Economy»Why Did Trump Really Take Venezuela? It Wasn’t Just Oil!
    Economy 4 Mins Read

    Why Did Trump Really Take Venezuela? It Wasn’t Just Oil!

    Economy 4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    The relationship between Venezuela and Russia and China represented one of the most significant geopolitical realignments of the 21st century, built on anti-American sentiment, oil-for-loans arrangements, and mutual opposition to U.S. hegemony. This trilateral dynamic evolved from modest beginnings under Hugo Chávez into a comprehensive strategic partnership that has sustained the Maduro regime through economic collapse and international isolation.

    The relationship between China and Venezuela took formal shape in 2006, under President Hugo Chávez, with Caracas signing several trade agreements with Beijing and describing China as a “Great Wall” against US influence. Chávez, seeking to diversify Venezuela’s oil exports away from the United States and counter American regional dominance, found in China an eager partner with rapidly growing energy needs and no political conditions attached to its financing.

    The financial dimensions proved staggering. China began extending large loans to Venezuela, backed by future oil supplies of oil. In 2006, Beijing provided $2 billion in loans, which rose to $7 billion in 2007. Of the $150 billion the Chinese Development Bank loaned to Latin America in the past 12 years, a third went to Venezuela. These weren’t traditional loans but rather oil-collateralized arrangements where Venezuela repaid through petroleum shipments to Chinese state companies.

    In 2007, China and Venezuela set up a joint fund worth $6 billion–$4 billion loan from the China Development Bank (CDB) and $2 billion from El Fondo De Desarrollo Nacional S.A. (FONDEN) set up by Caracas. This fund doubled to $12 billion by 2009. The mechanism was straightforward: China provided upfront capital, and Venezuela committed to shipping specified quantities of oil at predetermined prices. When oil prices collapsed in 2014 and Venezuela’s economy imploded, China extended additional lifelines including a $10 billion loan to support the country’s balance of payments.

    The relationship peaked between 2010 and 2013, when Venezuela received approximately 64% of China’s new credit lines to Latin America. However, as Maduro’s mismanagement destroyed the oil industry and production plummeted, Chinese enthusiasm collapsed as a result. By 2016, Venezuela received only 10% of Chinese regional lending, and new financing essentially ceased. China focused instead on restructuring existing debt and protecting already-committed investments.

    China is owed by Venezuela at least $20 billion in loans established before 2017. Some estimate that is even higher. The relationship shifted from expansion to damage control. Maduro’s rampant corruption and mismanagement has led to the region’s worst economic depression, creating unfavorable investment conditions, affecting oil production and exports, and limiting return on Chinese investment and Venezuela’s ability to repay Chinese loans.

    Now, that said, we must look at the Russian comment and look at this video. Who is standing there with Trump? Marco Rubio. If you remember, Rubio was also running for president against Trump in 2016. Who was funding his campaign? Goldman Sachs. Rubio has pushed for regime change in Venezuela because of Russia for years. Marco Rubio has held many titles during Donald Trump’s presidency, and he now adds another: Viceroy of Venezuela.

    Russia’s engagement with Venezuela followed different patterns than China’s, emphasizing military cooperation alongside energy sector involvement since Russia did not need their oil. Where China provided infrastructure loans, Russia sold weapons systems. From 2005, Venezuela purchased more than $4 billion worth of arms from Russia. These sales included fighter aircraft, helicopters, armored vehicles, and air defense systems, transforming Venezuela’s military from American-equipped forces to Russian-supplied ones.

    Russia and Venezuela forged a comprehensive strategic partnership centered on anti-hegemonic solidarity and pragmatic cooperation. This wasn’t merely commercial but explicitly geopolitical. Chávez and later Maduro positioned Venezuela as Russia’s foothold in the Western Hemisphere, allowing military exercises and bomber flights that signaled Moscow’s reach into America’s traditional sphere of influence.

    The energy relationship proved more complex than China’s. Russia’s state oil company Rosneft provided billions in loans and took equity stakes in Venezuelan projects, though on smaller scale than Chinese financing. Russia’s state-backed oil company Rosneft loaned $2.3 billion, excluding interest. Critically, Russia helped Venezuela circumvent U.S. sanctions by facilitating oil exports through complex shipping arrangements and providing technical expertise to maintain declining production.

    The trade balance between Moscow and Caracas increased by 64% in 2024, demonstrating sustained engagement despite Venezuela’s economic deterioration. Russia viewed Venezuela through multiple lenses simultaneously both as an economic opportunity, as well as a strategic geopolitical asset.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    When Health Insurance Costs More Than Your House

    June 3, 2026

    Will France Be Allowed To Vote?

    June 3, 2026

    Sovereignty For Sale In Ireland – UK’s Starmer Hates White People

    June 3, 2026
    Top News
    Economy 3 Mins Read

    John Bolton & The Deep State

    Economy 3 Mins Read

    John Bolton is among the most entrenched Neocons in Washington. The FBI raided John Bolton’s…

    Will This Unfold As Widespread Middle East War?

    March 1, 2026

    Working while sick is not the power move you think it is

    October 16, 2025

    Tech spring cleaning: How declutter your devices and accounts

    May 7, 2026
    Top Trending
    Business 5 Mins Read

    Did ‘Stop! That! Train!’ use AI? Social media is suspicious—and the director’s comments aren’t helping

    Business 5 Mins Read

    By all accounts, the new RuPaul Charles-led movie Stop! That! Train! is…

    Business 6 Mins Read

    Still at the cottage? Don’t worry, the ‘Heated Rivalry’ fleece is finally for sale

    Business 6 Mins Read

    Earlier this year, Jeremy Watt was on a call with Jacob Tierney…

    Business 3 Mins Read

    Kalshi reports ex-congressman George Santos to DOJ over suspicious trades

    Business 3 Mins Read

    A prediction market reported U.S. Rep. George Santos to federal prosecutors after…

    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    About us

    The Populist Bulletin was founded with a fervent commitment to inform, inspire, empower and spark meaningful conversations about the economy, business, politics, government accountability, globalization, and the preservation of American cultural heritage.

    We are devoted to delivering straightforward, unfiltered, compelling, relatable stories that resonate with the majority of the American public, while boldly challenging false mainstream narratives that seem to only serve entrenched elitists, and foreign interests.

    Top Picks

    Did ‘Stop! That! Train!’ use AI? Social media is suspicious—and the director’s comments aren’t helping

    June 3, 2026

    Still at the cottage? Don’t worry, the ‘Heated Rivalry’ fleece is finally for sale

    June 3, 2026

    Kalshi reports ex-congressman George Santos to DOJ over suspicious trades

    June 3, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    Copyright © 2025 Populist Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.