Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    TRENDING :
    • Are Democrats Finding Their Spines?
    • Apple just closed its first unionized store. What does that mean for its workers?
    • Celebrating America Shouldn’t Be Such a Partisan Task
    • Why your next Xbox, iPad, or laptop may suddenly cost hundreds more
    • Hollywood is jumping into this mobile-friendly storytelling format, and it’s drawing in major stars
    • Inside CAA’s new Nashville office, where a listening lounge, sports bar, and employee dressing rooms are the amenities
    • Her debut novel was turned into a Prime Video series. Now, Carley Fortune is relishing in the romance renaissance
    • Why AOC Needs to Apologize For Her Infamous DNC Speech
    Populist Bulletin
    • Home
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    • Economy
    • Business
    • Headline News
    Populist Bulletin
    Home»World Politics»Assistant U.S. Attorney Blasts Los Angeles County After It Votes to Ban ICE Agents from Wearing Masks | The Gateway Pundit
    World Politics 3 Mins Read

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Blasts Los Angeles County After It Votes to Ban ICE Agents from Wearing Masks | The Gateway Pundit

    World Politics 3 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Los Angeles Special Response Team (SRT) within Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) (Credit: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement)

    Los Angeles County’s far-left Board of Supervisors voted Tuesday to advance an unprecedented ordinance that would ban law enforcement officers, including federal immigration agents, from wearing masks while working in unincorporated areas of the county.

    The proposal passed 4-0, with only Supervisor Kathryn Barger abstaining. A final vote is scheduled for next week, and the ordinance would take effect in January 2026, according to the LA Times.

    The supervisors want all law enforcement officers, including ICE, Homeland Security Investigations agents, and other federal personnel, to reveal their faces and display identification at all times.

    Since summer, ICE’s elite teams have been storming the shadows of Home Depot parking lots, car washes, and street corners, rounding up the hordes of illegal invaders who’ve been raping, murdering, and draining our resources dry.

    ICE agents are increasingly forced to protect their identities due to harassment, online doxxing, and threats by anti-enforcement activists.

    More from the LA Times:

    Legal experts say federal immigration agents would not be required to follow a county mask ban. The county’s top lawyer, Dawyn Harrison, has said she suspects the federal government will likely argue that the county law violates the Constitution, which states that federal law takes precedence over conflicting local statutes.

    “If this leads to a fight with the federal government in the courts, I think it’s a fight worth having,” said Supervisor Janice Hahn, who spearheaded the ban.

    Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin has said immigration agents need to disguise themselves to avoid having their names publicized or being “doxed.”

    The motion passed 4-0, with Supervisor Kathryn Barger abstaining. Per county policy, the ban must be approved once more, and the vote is scheduled for next week. The ban would go into effect in January 2026.

    “If you carry the power of a badge here, you must be visible, accountable and identifiable to the people you serve,” said Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, who co-authored the motion.

    After the vote, Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, Bill Essayli, issued a blistering statement slamming the supervisors for endangering federal personnel and interfering with the enforcement of federal law:

    “Let me be very clear: the county has no jurisdiction over federal agents, and we will not comply with any state or local laws restricting federal law enforcement.

    Our agents are under unprecedented assault in Los Angeles, largely due to reckless narratives and rhetoric advanced by the media and local politicians.

    We will not expose our brave men and women to personal attacks by allowing agitators to dox them and their families through facial recognition tools.”

    Let me be very clear: the county has no jurisdiction over federal agents, and we will not comply with any state or local laws restricting federal law enforcement.

    Our agents are under unprecedented assault in Los Angeles, largely due to reckless narratives and rhetoric advanced… https://t.co/BCaHUkVNP7

    — F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli (@USAttyEssayli) December 3, 2025





    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Breaking: FBI Arrests Suspect in DC Pipe Bomber Investigation | The Gateway Pundit

    December 4, 2025

    Ukrainians Attack Druzhba Oil Pipeline Again, Threatening Energy Supplies to Hungary and Slovakia (VIDEOS) | The Gateway Pundit

    December 4, 2025

    Victor Reacts: Is the Minneapolis Police Chief Trying to Have a Stand-off with ICE? (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

    December 4, 2025
    Top News
    Economy 2 Mins Read

    Amazon To Replace 600K Jobs With AI

    Economy 2 Mins Read

    The headlines continue to support what the computer has been stating—unemployment in the US will…

    Petro-states vs. electro-states: What to watch for the global energy transition in 2026

    January 10, 2026

    How to figure out if AI is making you more productive

    April 30, 2026

    Bernie Sanders Says a Mamdani Win Can Transform American Politics

    November 4, 2025
    Top Trending
    US Politics 9 Mins Read

    Are Democrats Finding Their Spines?

    US Politics 9 Mins Read

    At an Open Markets Institute conference, economic populism was on the agenda.…

    Business 4 Mins Read

    Apple just closed its first unionized store. What does that mean for its workers?

    Business 4 Mins Read

    In 2022, an Apple Store outside of Baltimore became the first in…

    US Politics 6 Mins Read

    Celebrating America Shouldn’t Be Such a Partisan Task

    US Politics 6 Mins Read

    Our Back Pages / June 26, 2026 How did anniversary events become…

    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    About us

    The Populist Bulletin was founded with a fervent commitment to inform, inspire, empower and spark meaningful conversations about the economy, business, politics, government accountability, globalization, and the preservation of American cultural heritage.

    We are devoted to delivering straightforward, unfiltered, compelling, relatable stories that resonate with the majority of the American public, while boldly challenging false mainstream narratives that seem to only serve entrenched elitists, and foreign interests.

    Top Picks

    Are Democrats Finding Their Spines?

    June 26, 2026

    Apple just closed its first unionized store. What does that mean for its workers?

    June 26, 2026

    Celebrating America Shouldn’t Be Such a Partisan Task

    June 26, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    Copyright © 2025 Populist Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.