Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    TRENDING :
    • Your Message Was Clear, So Why Didn’t Your Team Act on It?
    • Elon Musk DESTROYS The Economist Editor for Smearing “Normal People” as “Far Right” — “More People Hate You and the Media than You Realize” * The Gateway Pundit * by Jim Hᴏft
    • Why Fewer Clicks Might Mean Better Marketing
    • They Want to Pay White Kids Less, Specifically Because They Are White! (VIDEO) * The Gateway Pundit * by Victor Nieves
    • The Metric You’re Using to Measure Customer Experience Is Costing You Revenue
    • IRS Threatens to Seize Tennessee Man’s Farm Over Interest Charged on Accidental Refund That He IMMEDIATELY Tried to Return
    • Brothers’ Business Hit $3M a Year With AI Vibe Coding: Junk Teens
    • The Houthis’ Path Into Iran’s War * The Gateway Pundit * by Antonio Graceffo
    Populist Bulletin
    • Home
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    • Economy
    • Business
    • Headline News
    Populist Bulletin
    Home»Business»Trump announces 100% tariffs on pharmaceutical drugs, beginning October 1
    Business 5 Mins Read

    Trump announces 100% tariffs on pharmaceutical drugs, beginning October 1

    Business 5 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    President Donald Trump said Thursday that he will put import taxes of 100% on pharmaceutical drugs, 50% on kitchen cabinets and bathroom vanities, 30% on upholstered furniture and 25% on heavy trucks starting on Oct. 1.
    The posts on his social media site showed that Trump’s devotion to tariffs did not end with the trade frameworks and import taxes that were launched in August, a reflection of the president’s confidence that taxes will help to reduce the government’s budget deficit while increasing domestic manufacturing.
    While Trump did not provide a legal justification for the tariffs, he appeared to stretch the bounds of his role as commander-in-chief by stating on Truth Social that the taxes on imported kitchen cabinets and sofas were needed “for National Security and other reasons.”
    Under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the administration launched a Section 232 investigation in April about the impacts on national security from pharmaceutical drug and truck imports. The Commerce Department launched a 232 investigation into timber and lumber in March, though it’s unclear whether the furniture tariffs stem from that.
    The tariffs are another dose of uncertainty for the U.S. economy with a solid stock market but a weakening outlook for jobs and elevated inflation. These new taxes on imports could pass through to consumers in the form of higher prices and dampen hiring, a process that economic data suggests is already underway.
    “We have begun to see goods prices showing through into higher inflation,” Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell warned in a recent news conference, adding that higher costs for goods account for “most” or potentially “all” of the increase in inflation levels this year.
    The president has pressured Powell to resign, arguing that the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates more aggressively because inflation is no longer a concern. Fed officials have stayed cautious on rate cuts because of the uncertainty created by tariffs.
    Trump said on Truth Social that the pharmaceutical tariffs would not apply to companies that are building manufacturing plants in the United States, which he defined as either “breaking ground” or being “under construction.” It was unclear how the tariffs would apply to companies that already have factories in the U.S.
    In 2024, America imported nearly $233 billion in pharmaceutical and medicinal products, according to the Census Bureau. The prospect of prices doubling for some medicines could send shock waves to voters as health care expenses, as well as the costs of Medicare and Medicaid, potentially increase.
    The pharmaceutical drug announcement was shocking as Trump has previously suggested that tariffs would be phased in over time so that companies had time to build factories and relocate production. On CNBC in August, Trump said he would start by charging a “small tariff” on pharmaceuticals and raise the rate over a year or more to 150% and even 250%.
    According to the White House, the threat of tariffs earlier this year contributed to many major pharmaceutical companies, including Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb and Eli Lilly, among others, to announce investments in U.S. production.
    Pascal Chan, vice president for strategic policy and supply chains at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, warned that the tariffs could harm Americans’ health with “immediate price hikes, strained insurance systems, hospital shortages, and the real risk of patients rationing or foregoing essential medicines.”
    The new tariffs on cabinetry could further increase the costs for homebuilders at a time when many people seeking to buy a house feel priced out by the mix of housing shortages and high mortgage rates. The National Association of Realtors on Thursday said there were signs of price pressures easing as sales listings increased 11.7% in August from a year ago, but the median price for an existing home was $422,600.
    Trump said that foreign-made heavy trucks and parts are hurting domestic producers that need to be defended.
    “Large Truck Company Manufacturers, such as Peterbilt, Kenworth, Freightliner, Mack Trucks, and others, will be protected from the onslaught of outside interruptions,” Trump posted.
    Trump has long maintained that tariffs are the key to forcing companies to invest more in domestic factories. He has dismissed fears that importers would simply pass along much of the cost of the taxes to consumers and businesses in the form of higher prices.
    His broader country-by-country tariffs relied on declaring an economic emergency based on a 1977 law, a drastic tax hike that two federal courts said exceeded Trump’s authority as president. The Supreme Court is set to hear the case in November.
    The president continues to claim that inflation is no longer a challenge for the U.S. economy, despite evidence to the contrary. The consumer price index has increased 2.9% over the past 12 months, up from an annual pace of 2.3% in April, when Trump first launched a sweeping set of import taxes.
    Nor is there evidence that the tariffs are creating factory jobs or more construction of manufacturing facilities. Since April, the Bureau of Labor Statistics has reported that manufacturers cut 42,000 jobs and builders have downsized by 8,000.
    “There’s no inflation,” Trump told reporters Thursday. “We’re having unbelievable success.”
    Still, Trump also acknowledged that his tariffs against China had hurt American farmers, who lost out on sales of soybeans. The president separately promised on Thursday to divert tariff revenues to the farmers hurt by the conflict, just as he did during his first term in 2018 and 2019 when his tariffs led to retaliation against the agricultural sector.


    —Josh Boak, Associated Press



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Your Message Was Clear, So Why Didn’t Your Team Act on It?

    July 24, 2026

    Why Fewer Clicks Might Mean Better Marketing

    July 24, 2026

    The Metric You’re Using to Measure Customer Experience Is Costing You Revenue

    July 23, 2026
    Top News
    Business 4 Mins Read

    It took 64 years to build Walmart. It took 3 years to turn it into a $1 trillion tech company

    Business 4 Mins Read

    On the one hand, the fact that Walmart passed $1 trillion in market cap is notable, but not especially…

    Chipotle’s new brand chief gave fast-food burgers buzz. Now he’s coming for fast-casual burritos

    April 30, 2026

    Trump is planning to revamp the ‘president’s golf course’

    January 3, 2026

    Wall Street is quiet ahead of holiday closures as markets await new U.S. economic data

    December 23, 2025
    Top Trending
    Business 7 Mins Read

    Your Message Was Clear, So Why Didn’t Your Team Act on It?

    Business 7 Mins Read

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Key Takeaways A clear…

    World Politics 3 Mins Read

    Elon Musk DESTROYS The Economist Editor for Smearing “Normal People” as “Far Right” — “More People Hate You and the Media than You Realize” * The Gateway Pundit * by Jim Hᴏft

    World Politics 3 Mins Read

    Elon Musk fires back at The Economist editor-in-chief Zanny Minton Beddoes over…

    Business 9 Mins Read

    Why Fewer Clicks Might Mean Better Marketing

    Business 9 Mins Read

    Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. Key Takeaways Fewer clicks…

    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    About us

    The Populist Bulletin was founded with a fervent commitment to inform, inspire, empower and spark meaningful conversations about the economy, business, politics, government accountability, globalization, and the preservation of American cultural heritage.

    We are devoted to delivering straightforward, unfiltered, compelling, relatable stories that resonate with the majority of the American public, while boldly challenging false mainstream narratives that seem to only serve entrenched elitists, and foreign interests.

    Top Picks

    Your Message Was Clear, So Why Didn’t Your Team Act on It?

    July 24, 2026

    Elon Musk DESTROYS The Economist Editor for Smearing “Normal People” as “Far Right” — “More People Hate You and the Media than You Realize” * The Gateway Pundit * by Jim Hᴏft

    July 24, 2026

    Why Fewer Clicks Might Mean Better Marketing

    July 24, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    Copyright © 2025 Populist Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.