Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    TRENDING :
    • Elizabeth Holmes Ate Think Jerky, Changed the Business: ‘Wild’
    • Miami-Notre Dame, Utah-BYU Headline Week 10 Best Bets
    • Martin Armstrong On The Iran War And Why 2032 Is Closer Than You Think
    • Your Social Media Team Needs More Training — Not More Tasks
    • Ty Jerome Dishes Five Assists in 21-Point Night
    • This Violinist Became Snoop’s $10K-a-Month Ice Cream Taster
    • Northwest Colorado Development Council Hosts Annual Meeting Monday
    • The Unique Hiring Strategy I Used to Build a Global Team
    Populist Bulletin
    • Home
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    • Economy
    • Business
    • Headline News
    Populist Bulletin
    Home»Business»AI tools aren’t making much of a difference for companies
    Business 4 Mins Read

    AI tools aren’t making much of a difference for companies

    Business 4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email Copy Link
    Follow Us
    Google News Flipboard
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    These days, investors, founders, analysts, and tech loyalists can’t stop talking up how artificial intelligence will radically remake the future of work. But a new study suggests that while AI might have some amazing future uses, at the moment, it’s not doing much good to anyone.

    In a “State of AI in Business 2025” report, researchers at MIT Media Lab found that despite enterprise investments of as much as $40 billion in generative AI, 95% of organizations have seen no return on their investment so far.

    “Just 5% of integrated AI pilots are extracting millions in value, while the vast majority remain stuck with no measurable P&L [profit and loss] impact,” the report reads. “This divide does not seem to be driven by model quality or regulation, but seems to be determined by approach.”

    Tools like OpenAI’s Chat GPT and Microsoft’s Copilot have been widely tested, with more than 80% of organizations either exploring them or using them in pilot programs. But while these tools boost individual productivity, when it comes to overall P&L, there’s very little measurable impact, the study found.

    Enterprise-level AI systems aren’t doing a lot to impress either. While 60% of the enterprise companies that the researchers spoke with said they evaluated these tools, only 20% made it as far as the pilot stage. And just 5% took those to a full production model. A lack of contextual learning, brittle workflows, and misalignment with day-to-day operations were cited as the chief reasons the tools were rejected.

    The slop problem

    Behavioral researcher BetterUp Labs, in collaboration with the Stanford Social Media Lab, says it has identified one possible reason enterprise companies are rejecting AI: slop. Employees, the two labs say, are using AI tools to create low-effort, passable-looking work. They’ve taken to calling this “workslop”—well-formatted slides, reports, summaries, or code that might seem helpful at first, but that ultimately prove to be incomplete or missing context, shifting the burden of work to someone else.

    “Of 1,150 U.S.-based full-time employees across industries, 40% report having received workslop in the last month,” the groups wrote. “Employees who have encountered workslop estimate that an average of 15.4% of the content they receive at work qualifies.”

    There is one advantage for workers when it comes to AI not living up to its billing: Job losses, so far, haven’t been as bad as doomsayers have predicted. Should more companies stick with AI integration, however, that could change.

    “While most implementations don’t drive head count reduction, organizations that have crossed the GenAI Divide are beginning to see selective workforce impacts in customer support, software engineering, and administrative functions,” the report reads.

    Dispelling doom

    When it works, AI can cut back-office operational expenses—for example, in administration, finance, and human resources—the MIT researchers found. In addition, it can improve customer retention and sales conversion by using automated outreach and by following up intelligently. Best of all, few of these improvements come with a human cost.

    “Early results suggest that learning-capable systems, when targeted at specific processes, can deliver real value, even without major organizational restructuring,” the report reads.

    That’s likely a relief to some workers who have heard little but fatalistic scenarios. In July, for instance, Aravind Srinivas, the CEO of Perplexity, warned that recruiters and executive assistants could be made extraneous as AI browsers become more prevalent.

    And in May, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei told Axios that AI could wipe out roughly 50% of all entry-level white-collar jobs within five years, which he said could cause unemployment to spike to between 10% and 20%.

    That warning, he said, was aimed at both lawmakers and his peers in the AI world.

    “Most of them are unaware that this is about to happen,” Amodei said. “It sounds crazy, and people just don’t believe it. . . . We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming.”



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Elizabeth Holmes Ate Think Jerky, Changed the Business: ‘Wild’

    November 7, 2026

    Your Social Media Team Needs More Training — Not More Tasks

    November 7, 2026

    This Violinist Became Snoop’s $10K-a-Month Ice Cream Taster

    November 7, 2026
    Top News
    Business 7 Mins Read

    A teacher was killed during an ICE chase last week. Why you probably didn’t hear about it

    Business 7 Mins Read

    One week ago, a Savannah, Georgia, woman was killed during an Immigration and Customs Enforcement…

    Why Do Enterprise Brands Avoid Testing Bold Ideas in Public?

    July 26, 2026

    Drone use could skyrocket after the FAA changes this rule

    June 14, 2026

    Donald Trump’s Vaccine Statements Shock the World | The Gateway Pundit

    September 23, 2025
    Top Trending
    Business 6 Mins Read

    Elizabeth Holmes Ate Think Jerky, Changed the Business: ‘Wild’

    Business 6 Mins Read

    Key Takeaways Hirsch founded Think Jerky, a meat snack focused on chef-crafted…

    World Politics 1 Min Read

    Miami-Notre Dame, Utah-BYU Headline Week 10 Best Bets

    World Politics 1 Min Read

    Saturday’s college football slate delivers a pair of marquee matchups, with Miami…

    Economy 2 Mins Read

    Martin Armstrong On The Iran War And Why 2032 Is Closer Than You Think

    Economy 2 Mins Read

    Legendary economic forecaster and historian Martin Armstrong returns to The Outer Limits…

    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    About us

    The Populist Bulletin was founded with a fervent commitment to inform, inspire, empower and spark meaningful conversations about the economy, business, politics, government accountability, globalization, and the preservation of American cultural heritage.

    We are devoted to delivering straightforward, unfiltered, compelling, relatable stories that resonate with the majority of the American public, while boldly challenging false mainstream narratives that seem to only serve entrenched elitists, and foreign interests.

    Top Picks

    Elizabeth Holmes Ate Think Jerky, Changed the Business: ‘Wild’

    November 7, 2026

    Miami-Notre Dame, Utah-BYU Headline Week 10 Best Bets

    November 7, 2026

    Martin Armstrong On The Iran War And Why 2032 Is Closer Than You Think

    November 7, 2026
    Categories
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Headline News
    • Top News
    • US Politics
    • World Politics
    Copyright © 2025 Populist Bulletin. All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.